A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS: uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo

Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques; Deivison Henrique de Freitas Santos; Camila Mont’Alverne; Paulo Ferracioli Silva

doi:10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562

A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS: uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo

Translated title of the contribution: Editorial journalism and the JBS scandal in Brazil: a comparative study of Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo editorials

Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques
, Deivison Henrique de Freitas Santos
, Camila Mont’Alverne
, Paulo Ferracioli Silva

Marketing, Vaasa

Federal University of Paraná

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

This article examines the editorial positions held by two mainstream
Brazilian newspapers – Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo –
regarding the scandal involving the former president, Michel Temer and the businessman, Joesley Batista. We examine 103 editorials published between May and September 2017. The period begins the day after the scandal arose to the end of the term of the then Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot. Quantitative and qualitative content analysis indicates differences in how the two newspapers addressed the scandal: while
FSP insisted on distrusting Temer’s behavior, OESP criticized the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office. Both news outlets, however, agreed that the economic agenda had to be protected. This conclusion demonstrates the relevance of editorials for characterizing newspaper companies as players in the political game.

Translated title of the contribution	Editorial journalism and the JBS scandal in Brazil: a comparative study of Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo editorials
Original language	Portuguese
Article number	e226562
Peer-reviewed scientific journal	Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
Volume	33
Number of pages	39
ISSN	0103-3352
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562
Publication status	Published - 2020
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article - refereed

Keywords

518 Media and communications
editorial journalism
political journalism
editorials
political scandals
Michel Temer
JBS

Access to Document

10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562Licence: CC BY

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{1d16885678d64c8a93751838921b6f75,

title = "A atua{\c c}{\~a}o do jornalismo editorial no esc{\^a}ndalo JBS: uma an{\'a}lise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo",

abstract = "This article examines the editorial positions held by two mainstream Brazilian newspapers – Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo – regarding the scandal involving the former president, Michel Temer and the businessman, Joesley Batista. We examine 103 editorials published between May and September 2017. The period begins the day after the scandal arose to the end of the term of the then Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot. Quantitative and qualitative content analysis indicates differences in how the two newspapers addressed the scandal: while FSP insisted on distrusting Temer{\textquoteright}s behavior, OESP criticized the Federal Public Prosecutor{\textquoteright}s Office. Both news outlets, however, agreed that the economic agenda had to be protected. This conclusion demonstrates the relevance of editorials for characterizing newspaper companies as players in the political game.",

keywords = "518 Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap, editorial journalism, political journalism, editorials, political scandals, Michel Temer, JBS",

author = "Marques, \{Francisco Paulo Jamil\} and Santos, \{Deivison Henrique de Freitas\} and Camila Mont{\textquoteright}Alverne and \{Ferracioli Silva\}, Paulo",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562",

language = "Portugisiska",

volume = "33",

journal = "Revista Brasileira de Ci{\^e}ncia Pol{\'i}tica",

issn = "0103-3352",

publisher = "Instituto de Ci{\^e}ncia Pol{\'i}tica da Universidade de Bras{\'i}lia , Brazil",

}

A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS: uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo. / Marques, Francisco Paulo Jamil; Santos, Deivison Henrique de Freitas; Mont’Alverne, Camila et al.
In: Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Vol. 33, e226562, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS

T2 - uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo

AU - Marques, Francisco Paulo Jamil

AU - Santos, Deivison Henrique de Freitas

AU - Mont’Alverne, Camila

AU - Ferracioli Silva, Paulo

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article examines the editorial positions held by two mainstream Brazilian newspapers – Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo – regarding the scandal involving the former president, Michel Temer and the businessman, Joesley Batista. We examine 103 editorials published between May and September 2017. The period begins the day after the scandal arose to the end of the term of the then Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot. Quantitative and qualitative content analysis indicates differences in how the two newspapers addressed the scandal: while FSP insisted on distrusting Temer’s behavior, OESP criticized the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office. Both news outlets, however, agreed that the economic agenda had to be protected. This conclusion demonstrates the relevance of editorials for characterizing newspaper companies as players in the political game.

AB - This article examines the editorial positions held by two mainstream Brazilian newspapers – Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo – regarding the scandal involving the former president, Michel Temer and the businessman, Joesley Batista. We examine 103 editorials published between May and September 2017. The period begins the day after the scandal arose to the end of the term of the then Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot. Quantitative and qualitative content analysis indicates differences in how the two newspapers addressed the scandal: while FSP insisted on distrusting Temer’s behavior, OESP criticized the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office. Both news outlets, however, agreed that the economic agenda had to be protected. This conclusion demonstrates the relevance of editorials for characterizing newspaper companies as players in the political game.

KW - 518 Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap

KW - editorial journalism

KW - political journalism

KW - editorials

KW - political scandals

KW - Michel Temer

KW - JBS

U2 - 10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562

DO - 10.1590/0103-3352.2020.33.226562

M3 - Artikel

SN - 0103-3352

VL - 33

JO - Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política

JF - Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política

M1 - e226562

ER -

A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS: uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this