Abstract
Research on news coverage of health threats, including COVID-19, often emphasizes excessive fearmongering and politicization, at the expense of reporting on scientific responses and preventive measures. To advance the debate on COVID-19 news and investigate the impact of populism on health crisis reporting, this article examines journalistic framings of COVID-19 in four countries led by populist politicians at the start of the pandemic: Brazil, Poland, Serbia, and the United States. Based on framing analysis of 2089 stories published in 12 outlets between 2020 and 2022, our findings confirm the lack of science and technology frames and prominence of politicization, but question claims about overly alarmist coverage. We also find that coverage was polarized along the pro- versus antipopulist axis, with some outlets openly critical of populism (“media against populism”) and others supporting populist actors due to ownership pressures or regulatory control (“populism over the media”).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | International Communication Gazette |
| ISSN | 1748-0485 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 06.07.2026 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- 518 Media and communications
- 517 Political science
- COVID-19 coverage
- health risks
- news frames
- politicization
- politics
- populism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond populism through and by the media? Populist politics and journalistic framings of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, Poland, Serbia, and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver