Abstract
A major shift in private and public investment is needed to forge a transition to a circular economy. A recent surge of activity from policy makers, the financial industry, and other stakeholders suggests commitment and progress toward providing resources to facilitate this process. In this forum article, we provide a measured, and in some respects critical and corrective, assessment of these developments. We highlight the risk that progress toward a circular economy will be curtailed by strategic decisions based on contestable understanding, fuzzy indicators, and inadequate information. Before major industry actors implement international investment standards, launch innovative financing vehicles, and ramp up investment, we call for more effective oversight to prevent the circular economy from becoming yet another compromised and ultimately ineffectual sustainability concept.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Industrial Ecology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1192-1200 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| ISSN | 1088-1980 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18.06.2020 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- circular economy
- environment and finance
- industrial ecology
- socially responsible investing (SRI)
- sustainability indicators
- sustainable development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Circular economy finance: Clear winner or risky proposition?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver