Abstract
In our framed laboratory experiment, two Public Officials, A and B, make consecutive decisions regarding embezzlement from separate funds. Official B observes Official A’s decisions before making his/her own. We find a contagion effect of embezzlement in that facing a corrupt official A increases the likelihood of embezzlement by Official B. Likewise, deterrence matters in that higher detection probabilities significantly decrease the likelihood of embezzlement. Crucially, when the same deterrence policy applies to both officials, detection is more effective in curbing embezzlement if chosen by an honest public official A rather than a corrupt public official A. This legitimacy effect may help explain why anti-corruption policies can fail in countries where the government itself is believed (or known) to be corrupt.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Legal Studies |
| ISSN | 0047-2530 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 06.2019 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- 511 Economics
- expeirmental economics
- behavioural economics
- game theory
- microeconomics
- welfare analysis
- honesty
- corruption
- process fairness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deterrence, Peer-Effect, and Legitimacy in Anti-Corruption Policy: An Experimental Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver