Abstract
Prior research reports that analysts focus on street earnings, which are measures that typically exceed GAAP earnings. Using a sample of CEO turnovers from 1993 to 2016 we show that the likelihood and speed of forced CEO turnover - but not voluntary turnover - are higher when analysts exclude income-decreasing items. The association between exclusions and forced turnovers is particularly pronounced for high magnitude exclusions. We also show that greater street exclusion of income-decreasing items, the lower CEO bonus payouts. We find that boards use audited and more conservative GAAP earnings in evaluating and dismissing CEOs, except in the recent period of 2010–2016.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Journal of Corporate Finance |
| Volume | 56 |
| Pages (from-to) | 249-266 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISSN | 0929-1199 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 06.2019 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- CEO turnover
- GAAP earnings
- Street earnings
- Street exclusions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Earnings performance measures and CEO turnover: Street versus GAAP earnings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver