Abstract
Contemporary human-centered organization and management practices endanger the planet’s health, affecting the life and death of multiple species-including humans. Drawing on insights from multispecies ethnography and feminist new materialism, this article contributes to the business ethics literature by developing a theoretical framework for multispecies organizing as a matter of care. Going beyond existing understandings of human-animal relations, we show how ethico-political dynamics shape multispecies relations in three ways: how we and other species relate to ecologies-in-place (affective relationalities); what we and other species do (vital doings); and, finally, what kinds of worlds we-through our ethical sensibilities-commit to bringing into being (ethical obligations). Using an illustrative example of a rewilding site in England, this article shows how multispecies organizing plays out in a specific ecology-in-place. Our argument has important implications for the conception and contemporary practices of the organizational ethics of life and death.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Business Ethics Quarterly |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| ISSN | 1052-150X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19.05.2025 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- affect
- ethics of care
- more-than-human responsibility
- regenerative organizations
- relational sustainability
- rewilding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Multispecies Organizing in the Web of Life: Ethico-Political Dynamics of Matters of Care in Ecologies-in-Place'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver