Abstract
This Speaking Out essay critically interrogates the hegemony of net-zero as the dominant framework guiding climate and environmental governance. We argue that net-zero is not a neutral technical climate mitigation target but a world-making practice that restructures ecological relations through calculative, managerial, and market logics. Drawing on political ontology and pluriversal thinking, we conceptualise net-zero as enacting interconnected forms of economic, material, temporal, and epistemic violence that displace responsibility, legitimise extractivism, and marginalise alternative lifeworlds. As net-zero increasingly shapes how sustainability is organised – also extending into biodiversity and conservation domains – we call on organisation and management scholars to scrutinise its assumptions and engage more deeply with its political and ontological consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific journal | Organization |
| ISSN | 1350-5084 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16.06.2026 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article - refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- 512 Business and Management
- 517 Political science
- climate change
- extractivism
- financialisation
- more-than-human relations
- political ontology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The violence of Net-Zero: Towards pluriversal engagements with ecology and place'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver