Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency

Helene  Willadsen; Sarah  Zaccagni; Marco Piovesan; Erik Wengström

doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029

Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency

Helene Willadsen
, Sarah Zaccagni ^*
, Marco Piovesan
, Erik Wengström

^*Huvudförfattare för detta arbete

Helsinki GSE, Helsingfors

Forskningsoutput: Tidskriftsbidrag › Artikel › Vetenskaplig › Peer review

3 Citeringar (Scopus)

Sammanfattning

Cognitive skills affect individual choices. Researchers commonly use Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to assess the relationship between cognitive abilities and economic decision making. In this paper, we study the relationship between these measures, and investigate the extent to which they are correlated and whether they are best described as substitutes or complements. Combining a sample of 686 children and a sample of 2,332 adults, we compare individual performances in the RPM test and CRT test. First, we report a significant positive correlation between the two measures of 0.3. Second, we document that performance in both the RPM test and CRT are significant predictors of behavioral inconsistency observed in incentivized time and risk preference elicitation tasks for children and risk preference elicitation task for adults.

Originalspråk	Engelska
Referentgranskad vetenskaplig tidskrift	Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Volym	220
Sidor (från-till)	495-506
Antal sidor	12
ISSN	0167-2681
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029
Status	Publicerad - 28.02.2024
MoE-publikationstyp	A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Nyckelord

511 Nationalekonomi

Åtkomst av dokument

10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029Licens: CC BY

1-s2.0-S0167268124000672-mainPublicerad version, 1,74 MBLicens: CC BY

OpenUrl-tillgänglighet

Fulltext

Andra filer och länkar

Link to publication in Scopus

Citera det här

@article{fd1bbae6be994e15add30cbe5b81399f,

title = "Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency",

abstract = "Cognitive skills affect individual choices. Researchers commonly use Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to assess the relationship between cognitive abilities and economic decision making. In this paper, we study the relationship between these measures, and investigate the extent to which they are correlated and whether they are best described as substitutes or complements. Combining a sample of 686 children and a sample of 2,332 adults, we compare individual performances in the RPM test and CRT test. First, we report a significant positive correlation between the two measures of 0.3. Second, we document that performance in both the RPM test and CRT are significant predictors of behavioral inconsistency observed in incentivized time and risk preference elicitation tasks for children and risk preference elicitation task for adults.",

keywords = "511 Economics, Cognitive Reflection, Cognitive Skills, Inconsistent Behavior, Intelligence, Raven Progressive Matrices, Risk Preference, Time Preference",

author = "Helene Willadsen and Sarah Zaccagni and Marco Piovesan and Erik Wengstr{\"o}m",

note = "Funding Information: We are extremely grateful to the editors Daniela Puzzello and Eugenio Proto, and to two anonymous reviewers for their feedback. We thank the Carlsberg Foundation for generous financial support (Project: 108579). The activities of CEBI are financed by the Danish National Research Foundation, Grant DNRF134. Helene Willadsen gratefully acknowledges funding from the H2020 European Research Council (grant number 834540) as part of the project “DISTRACT”. We thank the numerous collaborators and students who have helped us in preparing and running this experiment. We thank the staff at the participating schools, the participating children, and their parents. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029",

language = "English",

volume = "220",

pages = "495--506",

journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization",

issn = "0167-2681",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency

AU - Willadsen, Helene

AU - Zaccagni , Sarah

AU - Piovesan, Marco

AU - Wengström, Erik

N1 - Funding Information: We are extremely grateful to the editors Daniela Puzzello and Eugenio Proto, and to two anonymous reviewers for their feedback. We thank the Carlsberg Foundation for generous financial support (Project: 108579). The activities of CEBI are financed by the Danish National Research Foundation, Grant DNRF134. Helene Willadsen gratefully acknowledges funding from the H2020 European Research Council (grant number 834540) as part of the project “DISTRACT”. We thank the numerous collaborators and students who have helped us in preparing and running this experiment. We thank the staff at the participating schools, the participating children, and their parents. Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/2/28

Y1 - 2024/2/28

N2 - Cognitive skills affect individual choices. Researchers commonly use Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to assess the relationship between cognitive abilities and economic decision making. In this paper, we study the relationship between these measures, and investigate the extent to which they are correlated and whether they are best described as substitutes or complements. Combining a sample of 686 children and a sample of 2,332 adults, we compare individual performances in the RPM test and CRT test. First, we report a significant positive correlation between the two measures of 0.3. Second, we document that performance in both the RPM test and CRT are significant predictors of behavioral inconsistency observed in incentivized time and risk preference elicitation tasks for children and risk preference elicitation task for adults.

AB - Cognitive skills affect individual choices. Researchers commonly use Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to assess the relationship between cognitive abilities and economic decision making. In this paper, we study the relationship between these measures, and investigate the extent to which they are correlated and whether they are best described as substitutes or complements. Combining a sample of 686 children and a sample of 2,332 adults, we compare individual performances in the RPM test and CRT test. First, we report a significant positive correlation between the two measures of 0.3. Second, we document that performance in both the RPM test and CRT are significant predictors of behavioral inconsistency observed in incentivized time and risk preference elicitation tasks for children and risk preference elicitation task for adults.

KW - 511 Economics

KW - Cognitive Reflection

KW - Cognitive Skills

KW - Inconsistent Behavior

KW - Intelligence

KW - Raven Progressive Matrices

KW - Risk Preference

KW - Time Preference

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85186572736

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029

M3 - Article

SN - 0167-2681

VL - 220

SP - 495

EP - 506

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

ER -

Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency

Sammanfattning

Nyckelord

Åtkomst av dokument

OpenUrl-tillgänglighet

Andra filer och länkar

Fingeravtryck

Citera det här